3D TV Sales Get Failing Grade So Far
By Doug Olenick -- TWICE, 11/19/2010
New York - A big fat D. ![]() Tom Galanis, operations VP for Sixth Avenue Electronics, (left) and Greg Tarr, TWICE's executive editor, at the 3DTV2011 conference. |
In a wide-ranging interview conducted by TWICE executive editor Greg Tarr at the NewBay Media 3DTV 2011 What's Next? Conference, held here on Nov. 18, Galanis was blunt in describing 3D's introduction to the public.
"As an industry we could have done a better job launching it. We should have had standardized glasses and we should have presented it to the consumer as a feature of a higher quality television," he said.
Galanis described 3D TV sales forecasts of 3 million to 5 million sets for 2011 a little high. He said stores with a trained sales staff, like Sixth Avenue, are better positioned to sell 3D TV due to the complicated nature of the product, which includes explaining why the person should spend more on the technology.
This includes the active shutter glasses required by many models, which Galanis pointed to as the primary stumbling block.
"Glasses, if you didn't have them it would have been a victory for 3D," Galanis said, adding the current pricing structure for the glasses is well above what the average consumer is willing to pay.
"I think $50 to $60 is what people are willing to spend and aftermarket [glasses] sales are not going well. People are only taking the bundled glasses," he said.
The industry trend for next year to go from the more expensive active shutter glasses to passive may not solve the problem. Galanis said the last thing needed is another standard, plus passive glasses do not deliver the same level of performance as their active shutter cousins.
To battle this problem the industry needs to standardize the equipment and target the marketing toward certain types of programming. He described these as spectacle types of shows.
There were a few bright points. Tarr said the average selling price of a 3D TV is around $1,700 compared with the $1,000 for a standard TV sale. Consumers also have not expressed worry over the various health issues -- like headaches and seizures -- that have surrounded the technology.
Sixth Avenue customers are also leaning toward plasma-based 3D TVs over LCD. Galanis attributed this to the plasma display's faster refresh, which delivers a better 3D experience.
Galanis said selling 3D TV should get easier as more 3D content becomes available and the growing interest in IPTV will help sales.
"Right now more people are interested in IPTV than 3D. However, if a person wants IPTV they would probably want 3D," Galanis said, adding these customers want bleeding edge technology.
Sixth Avenue is not counting on 3D TV to be a Black Friday driver since that is a price-driven event and 3D TV is still too expensive.
He did think consumers would come out during the holiday shopping period, despite the tough sales environment that is currently in place.
Talkback
-
Limited content and those stupid glasses are drawbacks.Until the technology gets better so you don't need glasses it's a big waste of time and dollars!
Barrett Monroe - 2010-24-11 07:39:03 EST -
Perhaps the issue is that people just don't care for 3D in the home. I for one hate the glasses which give me eye strain. The occasional 3D in the theater seems to be just fine and without the shutter glasses. Sitting at home with friends and family all wearing glasses is not appealing in the least to me. Also, the economy is in poor shape and people just went out to buy HD sets for the digital transition and just don't see the point or have the need to buy another set just for 3D. Also, in order to get lossless audio from Blu-ray, you need a 1.4 receiver. Too much too soon. Frankly, as an avid movie buff and Blu-ray reviewer, the 3D sight gags are really an annoyance at this point. Who need to see water shooting out a screen more than a few times, or sticks or arms and the like. It gets old fast. As for sports, shot from above as games have always been shot, lessens the 3D effect, almost to the point of being non existent. Sure, 3D adds depth but only from almost down on the field or pitch. Again, it is simply too much too soon. The CE industry is simply trying to create a demand that is simply not there, much like SACD and DVD-Audio.
Joe Whip - 2010-22-11 13:38:05 EST -
Lack of content and the use of glasses are huge drawbacks.Until they can internalize the technology to be viewed without glasses it's just a big waste of time and dollars.
Barrett Monroe - 2010-22-11 07:42:14 EST -
The movie studios should not offer manufactures of HD TV 3D sets exclusive 3D releases with their TV's.
Every manufacturer would have done well if ANY ONE could buy AviTAR IN 3D on December 1st. Panasonic, Samsung, Sony are all guilty of this process to sell their hardware. If every one was able to buy each major release this holiday season 3D would have had a better start.
Thank you Disney,Warner for your release of Christmas Carol,Polar express with no hardware purchase.
To change technology from active shutter glasses would be the the death and consumer confidence who recently bought into the introduction with movie releases requiring active shutter glasses.
Samsung left the owners of DLP in the cold by discontinuing their glasses telling consumers in their ads their DLP HD was 3D ready and future proof. Well they left the consumer with no where to go with the 3D feature but make many complaints on CNET. Samsung refused to anthing to this day to make good to consumers who bought into their technology.
So studios need to think more carefully about package offers with manufactures and the leaders in the technology need to be concerned with compatibility of any possible changes to hardware. Consumers who bought into active shutter glasses will become very very disturbed if the movies and equipment becomes obsolete in a very short time.
The best thing all manufactures of HD 3D TV and 3D releases from movie studios should cut prices drastacally to get these sets and movies into their homes for the holidays. In this economy it is the only way to go! Black friday is in one week!!!!!!!!!
EDMUND MEYER - 2010-19-11 18:43:21 EST -
Tom Galanis comment that "passive glasses do not deliver the same level of performance as their active shutter cousins" is not wholly accurate. In a private conversation with the product manager for a very large flat-panel TV company during June, 2010's "Selling 3D Conference" I was told that focus groups conducted for the company showed a very large consumer preference for passive glasses. The reason: 3D playback with passive glasses was much brighter than playback on comparably sized sets with active-shutter glasses.
Jeff Hipps - 2010-19-11 11:29:17 EST
No related content found.
Featured Company
-
Brightpoint
BrightPoint is a global leader in mobile device lifecycle services. We provide a full suite of end-to-end supply chain and customization solutions to manufacturers, retailers and carriers in the mobile device industry. In a world that is increasingly connected with ever-evolving ..more



















