To Case Or Not To Case
Slate’s Daniel Engber almost comes to the conclusion in this Slate article that cellphone cases and covers are a waste of money.
He draws back at the last minute (when his uncovered iPhone screen develops a 1.5-inch crack), but he raises the issue of what happens with a protective case mutes the aesthetics of a device.
I understand what Engber means - one of the best parts about buying a new phone (or iPod or Zune or digital camera) is admiring its sleekness when you unbox it. Cases hide the sleekness, the shininess, the newness of the device.
Still, Engber’s argument has one major flaw. He says:
“I never drop my phone.”
Really? Never? Or he just hasn’t dropped it yet? No one plans to drop their phone. It just happens. Like when you’re sitting at a Dunkin’ Donuts high-top table and it falls out of your pocket, shattering into several pieces on the tile floor.
So my (new and now-covered) Samsung Glyde might not look as nice as it did when I first took it out of the box. But it works - and that’s really the whole point, isn’t it?
ZoetMB commented:
I agree that the "best" part of a phone is not the outside aesthetics, but I also agree with Engber - what's the point, for example, of Apple's great industrial design aesthetic of an ultra thin phone with smooth lines and curves if it needs to be covered with a case anyway?
One of the reasons why the iPhone doesn't have a removable battery is supposedly because Jobs didn't want a seam in the rear cover, but again, what's the difference if it's covered by a case.
Seems to me the protection that a case provides should be built into the phone in the first place...rubber nubs, etc.
yea butt commented:
How is the best part of a phone the outside aesthetics? Come on. I buy a phone, GPS iPod for function NOT to gaze deep into its paint job. Most devices can handle a drop or two what I don’t like is how slipery they are in the pocket to begin with. thats what I want a case for - a little pocket grip but i find no options













