Free Newsletter Subscription
       

Tweeter Employees Weren’t ‘WARNed’

November 7, 2008

There’s a federal statute (the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, or WARN) that requires employers to give workers two month’s notice before a mass layoff or plant closing, and two month’s pay and benefits following termination.

For the 180 or so staff members at Tweeter headquarters who received their pink slips last week, that apparently didn’t happen, and two of them decided to do something about it.

The employees contacted the Sugar Law Center for Economic and Social Justice, a Detroit-based workers’ advocacy group, which in turn contacted its legal council, attorney Stuart Miller, a partner with the New York firm of Lankenau & Miller.

Miller, who has about 100 WARN Act cases under his belt, filed an amended class action complaint today against Tweeter and parent company Schultze Asset Management in the federal bankruptcy court in Delaware in an attempt to get the employees their due.

It won’t be easy, though.

While employees have priority over unsecured creditors, the plaintiffs will have to wait until Tweeter’s secured creditors get paid - assuming there’s anything left, Miller told TWICE.

Nevertheless, he is encouraging all HQ personnel to participate in the complaint by contacting him at (212) 581-5003 or sjm@lankmill.com.
(Store-level staffers can’t participate in the class action, Miller explained, as the showrooms employed less than the minimum headcount per facility required for coverage by WARN.)

Based on the frustration expressed by Tweeter employees in TWICE’s reader Talkback threads, the class action represents the final indignity in a long line of company missteps.

And based on a separate Talkback regarding layoffs at Circuit City headquarters last week, and the lousy outlook for retail in general, Miller has his work cut out for him.

Click here to read TWICE’s complete coverage of Circuit City and Tweeter.

Posted by Alan Wolf on November 7, 2008 | Comments (6)

November 14, 2008
In response to: Tweeter Employees Weren’t ‘WARNed’
Joe commented:







As a consumer who just got screwed by tweeter, i feel for the
employees. I put 2500.00 down money towards a sytem installation
and I have no idea if I will even get it back now that things are
shutting down. I feel dirty after dealing with tweeter.


November 14, 2008
In response to: Tweeter Employees Weren’t ‘WARNed’
Joe commented:

As a consumer who just got screwed by tweeter, i feel for the employees. I put 2500.00 down money towards a sytem installation and I have no idea if I will even get it back now that things are shutting down. I feel dirty after dealing with tweeter.


November 11, 2008
In response to: Tweeter Employees Weren’t ‘WARNed’
Tom commented:







I was part of their store closings a year and a half ago. They
offered employees a severance package based upon tenure. They
promptly filed Chapter 11, and that went out the window and down
the toilet. I lost about $15,000 and became responsible for several
thousand in medical bills when they reneged on the continuing
insurance they promised as part of their severance package. Tweeter
has a track record of not being faithful to the spirit of their
agreements. I filed my paperwork with the Trustee's attorney which
was a waste of postage. I will never see a dime. I could go on but
what is the point. It's just pouring salt onto an old wound.


November 11, 2008
In response to: Tweeter Employees Weren’t ‘WARNed’
Tom commented:

I was part of their store closings a year and a half ago. They offered employees a severance package based upon tenure. They promptly filed Chapter 11, and that went out the window and down the toilet. I lost about $15,000 and became responsible for several thousand in medical bills when they reneged on the continuing insurance they promised as part of their severance package. Tweeter has a track record of not being faithful to the spirit of their agreements. I filed my paperwork with the Trustee's attorney which was a waste of postage. I will never see a dime. I could go on but what is the point. It's just pouring salt onto an old wound.


November 8, 2008
In response to: Tweeter Employees Weren’t ‘WARNed’
D Dufresne commented:







This may be our only hope to for any kind of satisfaction from this
place. I encourage anyone displaced by tweeter llc/opco to get
involved with this.the more of us there is the better off we might
be.At this point what more do we have to lose.


November 8, 2008
In response to: Tweeter Employees Weren’t ‘WARNed’
D Dufresne commented:

This may be our only hope to for any kind of satisfaction from this place. I encourage anyone displaced by tweeter llc/opco to get involved with this.the more of us there is the better off we might be.At this point what more do we have to lose.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement




Advertisement


If you are having trouble accessing TWICE content or wish to subscribe to TWICE Online
please email customercare@mypressplus.com or call 866-71-PRESS (866-717-7377).
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   Affiliate Links
© 2011 NewBay Media, LLC. 28 East 28th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10016 T (212) 378-0400 F (212) 378-0470
Use of this website is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy