Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to TWICE

Consumers See The Difference With Blu-ray

May 5, 2009

Dave Pedigo is CEDIA’ Sr. Director of Technology.

Based on some recent events, the CEDIA technology council decided to conduct a small survey of internal CEDIA staff members.

This is not considered a scientific study but instead a case study that should correlate relatively well to the general public. The survey took place on March 27 at CEDIA HQ.

There were 25 participants who chose to participate in the survey. They were asked to look at two identical displays and answer five questions. The displays were showing the movie “Twilight” playing in 720p via an MP4 download and 1080p on Blu-ray. Both displays were connected using high-quality 5-meter HDMI cables. The participants were not informed which display was Blu-ray and vice-versa as the display on the left was marked “A” and the display on the right was marked “B.”

Again, this is not considered to be a highly scientific study, but it should be pretty accurate. The survey was given to 21 women and 4 men. The displays were non-calibrated 40-inch LCDs on movie mode with identical movie mode settings. The lights were dimmed in the front of the room towards the displays and on in the back. The results were as follows:

Question One: Which picture looks better, A or B?


Blu-ray 92%
MP4 8%

Question Two: Which Picture is Blu-ray? 

On Question Two, 75 percent of respondents picked Blu-ray as having the superior picture quality. This shows some significant inroads in regards to branding Blu-ray and picture quality have been made. However, with 87 percent of respondents blindly choosing Blu-ray as having the better picture and only 75 percent associating Blu-ray with the best picture quality, the advantages of uncompressed 1080p formats is not universally recognized by the average person.

Question Three: On a scale of 1 to 10, what is your confidence level that your pick is correct?

As suspected, moving from a standard-definition 480i image to a 720p image decreased the confidence level ofthose choosing which picture looked better. In this instance, the confidence level of the participants was 67.8 percent, down from 81% in the first survey.

Question Four:  Do you buy movies because of deleted scenes and special features?


Yes, I purchase movies based on special features and deleted scenes. 38%
No, I do not make my purchasing decisions based on special features and deleted scenes. 63%

 

Question Five: Are you willing to purchase and download a movie on iTunes if it does not have deleted scenes and special features?

Yes, I would           65%
No, I would not      35%

Conclusion: The conclusion of the survey shows there is a measurable difference in image quality perceptible between uncompressed 1080p content on Blu-ray and compressed 720p iTunes. However, these differences are less noticeable than the comparing 480i to 1080p, as is expected. It should be noted that the accuracy and confidence moved down between the two surveys.

It should also be noted that, contrary to what one might expect, the lack of special features and deleted scenes does not seem to be a deterrent to most, as 69 percent of respondents stated they would purchase and download movie without those features.

CEDIA members who are concerned about the intermediary status of Blu-ray as a device should not worry too much. Although iTunes ease of use and portability are attractive, its lack of uncompressed 1080p content will serve as a deterrent against those with video purists as clients.

Footnote: Blu-Ray Disc is a registered trademark of the Blu-ray

Posted by Dave Pedigo on May 5, 2009 | Comments (6)
Industries: Video

May 28, 2009
In response to: Consumers See The Difference With Blu-ray
kyle commented:

hey i will tell you what all digital media is compressed in some way other than going to the movies and seeing the actual film reel, but would you honestly say the film reel provides a better picture QUALITY than that of Blu raY?? No one would the size is naturally much larger by sawing uncompressed i think all readers of this blog would understand that the author means TRUE 1080P of course it is compressed but it is the BEST compression format digital media has EVER seen props to the author, and popps to the guy that said the terminology was wrong. everyone gets the authors message loud and clear, i also agree that Bose does not make the BEST audio systems available, they do make a great one however. To my point if you could not understand the authors point you probably have no business reading it in the first place. I also disagree with prior comment about all digital cables being the same, certainly not there is a clear difference in that of monster cable and radio shack brand, try getting a one year manufacturer warranty from radio shack and 24k gold plating and noise reducing insullation . . . not going to happen, also if there is no difference then why does monster have a large portion of the market share and have a much more recognized brand name than any other cable manufacture on the market. ?? answer me that smart guy.


May 25, 2009
In response to: Consumers See The Difference With Blu-ray
Ghys commented:

@Anony: how are things at the first level?


May 18, 2009
In response to: Consumers See The Difference With Blu-ray
Matt commented:

@Anony: Wow. *rolls eyes*


May 17, 2009
In response to: Consumers See The Difference With Blu-ray
Anony commented:

Monster Cables do not give any advantage. All digital cables are the same. Bose don't make the best sound systems either.


May 13, 2009
In response to: Consumers See The Difference With Blu-ray
Matt commented:

Heh, of course. But why do you keep calling it "uncompressed 1080p?" Hardly. It's highly compressed -- relative to uncompressed, but not relative to that iTunes and other downloaded junk. The inclusion of that adjective is superfluous... Otherwise-good writing loses credibility when it sounds like the author and/or their organization don't know what they're talking about. BTW, hopefully the cables were Monster's best and the sound was pumpin' through a killer Bose sys!


May 5, 2009
In response to: Consumers See The Difference With Blu-ray
Paul commented:

How about doing VUDU vs. Blu-ray?

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
marketing module graphic, twice
Advertisement
TWICE Resource Center
NEWSLETTERS
TWICE eNews Daily
TWICE Retail eWeekly



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   Affiliate Links
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites